Thursday, May 29, 2008

Bush, McCain, & Hoover

The economic policies of the Bush Administration are not unprecedented. Like Ronald Reagan before him, and John McCain should he succeed him, George W. Bush is dismantling the government put in place by Presidents Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, James Earl Carter, and William Jefferson Clinton.

I expect my government to plan for the future and regulate corporate behavior the way I expect it to secure the borders, protect the air, water, and natural resources, and provide protection from muggers, rapists, and other criminals. As a thinking, voting, and tax paying citizen, I demand it. However, Bush, and McCain, like Herbert Hoover, believe that "Rugged Individualism" means not "one nation under God" but “every man for himself” and that government interference in the economy is "socialism." Hoover stood tall on the campaign trail in 1928, saying "Our country has become the land of opportunity ... not merely because of the wealth of its resources and industry, but because of freedom of initiative and enterprise."

Unfortunately however, the reality of that Republican Administration fell short of ideal when the excesses of the non-regulated 1920’s created the Great Depression. Hoover, personally unaffected by the Depression, until unemployed in 1933, stood rigid and wooden, a slave to his beliefs and misconceptions, unwilling and unable to help his fellow citizens.

Similarly, Bush stood idly by in the face of Hurricane Katrina, impotent, unable to do anything but pat Michael Brown, his well-connected friend, the head of FEMA, on the back and say 'Heck of a job'. He ignored the intelligence on bin Laden and Al Queda before Sept. 11, and has sinced mired our brave armed forces in a civil war in Iraq. He does nothing to spur the development of Clean Energy – Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Marine Current, etc., choosing instead to beg the Saudis to produce more oil.

We Americans, in the midst of The Great Depression, knew better than elect a laissez-faire Republicanista to the White House in 1932. Will we know better today?

Multiculturalism is not the issue

This was published in the Asbury Park Press, on line, and in the Asbury Park Press Community Reporter, Thursday, May 22, 2008.

LETTER OF THE WEEK: Parker's column on presidency lacked logic

Kathleen Parker is wrong in her May 15 commentary, " "Full-bloodedness' making difference in presidential choice," in the Asbury Park Press. I see three problems, none of which is "multiculturalism."

First, the competition is tough. There are 800 million people in India and 1.3 billion in China. Not all of them are smart, not all of them are aggressive and not all of them are tough. We are outnumbered 7 to 1. They don't all have to be smart, aggressive and tough, but enough of them are.

Second, we've become a nation of welfare queens. We drive our 10 mpg SUVs to the mall where we borrow money to buy junk that doesn't last, junk we are convinced we need, junk that is built by the people from whom we borrow the money, junk for which we'll be paying long after it's thrown into the landfills.

We got soft. We're not all that smart, tough or aggressive anymore.

Third, we trapped our soldiers in a quagmire in the crossfire of a civil war in Iraq. We toppled an evil dictator but our leaders didn't see that in his place would arise a power struggle. This has cost 4,000 American lives, 30,000 arms, hands or legs and $500 billion to $1 trillion, with no end in sight.

I don't know if stupidity, arrogance and incompetance are impeachable, but they should be.

We need to return to our roots, to what president Theodore Roosevelt called "actual life" and "the strenuous life." As he said in Chicago on April 10, 1899, "No country can long endure if its foundations are not laid deep in the material prosperity which comes from thrift, from business energy and enterprise, from hard, unsparing effort in the fields of industrial activity; but neither was any nation ever yet truly great if it relied upon material prosperity alone."

Presidents Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt, Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy were great leaders of a great nation.

John McCain would lead a nation that looks like him — old, weak, and tired.

Hillary Clinton would lead a nation that was once bright, beautiful and optimistic, that remains ambitious, but has become bitter and disillusioned.

Barack Obama will lead a nation that dares to be bold, that dares to be great.

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Edward R. Murrow or Ed Sullivan?

If you missed the Democratic presidential debate on ABC Wednesday night, Editor & Publisher called it "perhaps the most embarrassing performance by the media in a major presidential debate in years."

Moderators George Stephanopoulos and Charlie Gibson spent the first 50 minutes obsessed with distractions that only political insiders care about--gaffes, polling numbers, the stale Rev. Wright story, and the old-news Bosnia story. And, channeling Karl Rove, they directed a video question to Barack Obama asking if he loves the American flag or not. Seriously!

I want to know what they would do about global warming, Iraq, jobs and the economy, and Israel and the Palestinians. Energy independence, clean energy - solar, wind, kinetic, geothermal. Gas milage.

Actually, I don't watch the 'major networks.' I watch the Daily Show, the Colbert Report, Bill Maher, SNL, The Tonight Show. Maher, Colbert, and Jon Stewart are more like Edward R Murrow than Gibson and Stephanopoulos. They're more like Ed Sullivan. Thank god for NPR and the print media.

I just signed a petition to ABC and other media that says: "Debate moderators abuse the public trust every time they ask trivial questions about gaffes and 'gotchas' that only political insiders care about. Enough with the distractions--ABC and other networks must focus on issues that
affect people's daily lives."

Want to sign it too? We need a bunch of signers for ABC to take this concern seriously.
Click here to sign

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Visions of America

How did we get from Lincoln's vision of "Government of the people, for the people, and by the people."

And Kennedy's "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."

To Reagan's "The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

Ronald Reagan's Legacy

The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.
- Ronald Reagan


The trouble is, some agencies, like FEMA, SHOULD BE here to help.

Others, like the Air Force, the Army, the Marines, the Navy, the CIA, the FBI, the Justice Department,
the EPA, and the FAA, exist to protect the country and the citizens. Whether they are GOOD at it or not is another issue, and it's a management issue. But their purpose is either protective or defensive.

But if you agree with Reagan, as do George W. Bush, his heir, and his older baby brother, his Raoul Castro, John McCain,
that 'The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help' how do you justify holding office? Are you're saying 'I'm incompetent!' ? Or are you there with your hand out?

How Many Conservatves Does It Take to Change A Lightbulb?

Eleven -
One to import the bulb from China.
One to hire a Mexican to change the bulb.
One to hire a Private Investigator to check his documents.
One to hire a second Private Investigator to create "official" documents for the Mexican.
One to demand tax cuts for Exxon and the coal, oil, gas and nuclear power industries.
And SIX to blame the Liberals for the high cost of changing lightbulbs.

Thursday, April 3, 2008

Southwest and the FAA, Part 2

Cracks in the airplane fusilage - fire the inspectors.
Cracks in the nuclear power plant containment vessel - fire the whistle blower. (google Dennis Zannoni and Oyster Creek)
Refuse to prosecute innocent members of the other party - fire the Prosecutors.
Try to prosecute guilty members of the party in power - fire those Prosecutors, too.
The President lies about stupid affair with young woman from California - fire the President (or try to).

The President lies about war,
The Vice President shoots friend,
The White House identifies CIA Agent,
The President, Vice President, etc break or ignore the law -

So what?
It happens.
Get over it.

What has happened to this country?

"The scariest sentence is 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"
- Ronald Reagan